@prefix dcterms: .
@prefix foaf: .
@prefix wdrs: .
@prefix owl: .
@prefix xsd: .
@prefix gr: .
@prefix xml: .
@prefix vcard: .
@prefix dc: .
@prefix rdf: .
@prefix rdfs: .
@prefix pto: .
@prefix schema: .
# OWL DL work-arounds (instead of imports)
dc:contributor a owl:AnnotationProperty.
dc:creator a owl:AnnotationProperty.
dc:rights a owl:AnnotationProperty.
dc:subject a owl:AnnotationProperty.
dc:title a owl:AnnotationProperty.
dcterms:license a owl:AnnotationProperty.
wdrs:describedby a owl:AnnotationProperty.
foaf:Document a owl:Class.
foaf:homepage a owl:AnnotationProperty.
foaf:page a owl:AnnotationProperty.
foaf:primaryTopic a owl:AnnotationProperty.
schema:Product a owl:Class.
#OWL 1 DL compatibility of the OWL2 deprecated property
owl:deprecated a owl:AnnotationProperty.
a owl:Ontology;
dc:title "PTO: The Product Types Ontology for Semantic Web-based E-Commerce"@en;
rdfs:comment """The Product Types Ontology: Good identifiers for product types based on Wikipedia
This service provides GoodRelations-compatible class definitions for any type of product or service that has an entry in the English Wikipedia.
Vocabulary: http://www.productontology.org/#
Namespace: http://www.productontology.org/
The Product Types Ontology is designed to be used in combination with GoodRelations, a standard vocabulary for the commercial aspects of offers.
See http://purl.org/goodrelations/ for more information."""@en;
rdfs:label "The Product Types Ontology for Semantic Web-based E-Commerce"@en;
dc:contributor "The class abstracts and translations of labels are taken from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia."@en;
dc:creator "Martin Hepp"@en;
dc:rights "The class definition texts are taken from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) license, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/. Accordingly, all ontology class definitions provided in here are available under the very same license."@en;
dc:subject "E-Commerce, E-Business, GoodRelations, Ontology, Wikipedia, DBPedia"@en;
dcterms:license ;
rdfs:seeAlso ;
owl:imports ;
owl:versionInfo "2019-10-05T08:11:33.873221".
a foaf:Document;
foaf:primaryTopic .
a foaf:Document;
foaf:primaryTopic .
a foaf:Document;
foaf:primaryTopic .
a foaf:Document;
foaf:primaryTopic .
a owl:Class;
rdfs:subClassOf gr:ProductOrService, schema:Product;
rdfs:label "9/11 conspiracy theories"@en;
rdfs:comment """There are many conspiracy theories that attribute the planning and execution of the September 11 attacks against the United States to parties other than, or in addition to, al-Qaeda including that there was advance knowledge of the attacks among high-level government officials. Government investigations and independent reviews have rejected these theories. Proponents of these theories assert that there are inconsistencies in the commonly accepted version, or evidence that was either ignored or overlooked.
The most prominent conspiracy theory is that the collapse of the Twin Towers and 7 World Trade Center were the result of controlled demolitions rather than structural failure due to impact and fire. Another prominent belief is that the Pentagon was hit by a missile launched by elements from inside the U.S. government or that a commercial airliner was allowed to do so via an effective stand-down of the American military. Possible motives claimed by conspiracy theorists for such actions include justifying the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq (even though the U.S. government concluded Iraq was not involved in the attacks) to advance their geostrategic interests, such as plans to construct a natural gas pipeline through Afghanistan. Other conspiracy theories revolve around authorities having advance knowledge of the attacks and deliberately ignoring or assisting the attackers.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and the technology magazine Popular Mechanics have investigated and rejected the claims made by 9/11 conspiracy theorists. The 9/11 Commission and most of the civil engineering community accept that the impacts of jet aircraft at high speeds in combination with subsequent fires, not controlled demolition, led to the collapse of the Twin Towers, but some groups disagree with the arguments made by NIST and Popular Mechanics, including Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
(Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories)"""@en;
rdfs:isDefinedBy ;
rdfs:label "نظريات مؤامرة 11 سبتمبر"@ar;
rdfs:label "Конспиративни теории за атентатите от 11 септември 2001 г."@bg;
rdfs:label "Konspirační teorie o útocích z 11. září 2001"@cs;
rdfs:label "Konspirationsteorier om terrorangrebet den 11. september 2001"@da;
rdfs:label "Verschwörungstheorien zum 11. September 2001"@de;
rdfs:label "Konspiro-teorioj pri la 11-a de septembro 2001"@eo;
rdfs:label "Conspiraciones del 11-S"@es;
rdfs:label "11. septembri vandenõu"@et;
rdfs:label "تئوریهای توطئه ۱۱ سپتامبر"@fa;
rdfs:label "Syyskuun 11. päivän terroritekojen salaliittoteoriat"@fi;
rdfs:seeAlso ,
,
;
wdrs:describedby , ;
foaf:homepage ;
foaf:page .